Monday, November 3, 2008

你怎么说?

你怎么说?我无话可说



停手3天,去了浮罗交怡休息,没有新稿上载,如今回来补写。这期间发生一些大事情,当然分量最重的要数阿都拉萨唆使谋杀蒙古女郎表罪不成立,当庭释放

许多人对阿都拉萨的释放有不同的解读和分析,他和候任首相兼巫统主席纳吉的亲密关系成为这炸尸案的另一重点,很多疑团尚未开解,他已被法庭宣判表罪不成立,无需自我辩护。其他两名警察则同仁不同命...

对炸尸案,阿都拉萨表罪不成,你怎么说?我有很多话要说...

此外,回教裁决理事会将在本周五(7日)针对回教徒练瑜伽是否符合回教教义,练多会否影响回教徒对阿拉、回教和《可兰经》的信念。这真的很特别,很有意思。
KUALA LUMPUR: The National Fatwa Council will come out with a ruling on yoga exercise on Friday, said Department of Islamic Development Malaysia (Jakim) directorgeneral Datuk Wan Mohamad Sheikh Abdul Aziz.

He said the ruling would come following an indepth six-month study that had been undertaken after the matter was referred to the council three times.

The ruling is related to the faith of Muslims who practised yoga, Wan Mohamad told reporters after officiating a seminar on 'akidah' (faith) at the Wilayah Persekutuan Mosque on Saturday.



Yoga, related to exercise and mental discipline, has been practised since 3,300BC for improved health and is said to help slow down ageing, reduce risk of diabetes, asthma and heart-related diseases.

The daily exercise practice has many poses, positions and concentration techniques based on ancient Indian tradition. Also, Wan Mohamad said he regretted the attitude of Muslims in the country who were easily influenced by foreign cultures to the point of affecting their faith.

"When those involved take them as trends, such cultures can lead to a serious crime according to syariah law (Islamic law) and this can destroy the family institution," he said.

Wan Mohamed said the recent National Fatwa Council ruling to ban tomboyish behaviour, that is women looking like men whether in appearance or dressing, was to preserve the faith of Muslims.

He said syariah law could be brought to bear on Muslims who practice culture that could lead to a deviation of their faith.

上星期该理事会刚裁决TOMBOY违反回教,如今多了一个瑜伽。若这先例一开,日后恐怕打太极、练气功、跳韵律操、学silat以外的防身术、唱西洋歌曲、吹奏外国乐器也可能违反回教,还有很多很多...

回教拆决理事会,你怎么说?我不是回教徒,无权过问‘回家事务’,但是我只想问一句,这些拆决者练过瑜伽吗?清楚何谓瑜伽吗?若不了解瑜伽又怎知它违反回教教义呢?



推荐这篇由回教姐妹组织(Sisters In Islam)执行主任再娜安华撰写的文章,值得一读。

另一方面,真正的《你怎么说》,国营电视台华语时事清谈节目被腰斩,引来很多‘说’。为何不能《你怎么说》,我就是要说,吹么?

两名节目主持人分别以不同方式,通过部落格发表他们的意见。 林猷荃以直接方式,但文带保留地陈述事情经过,李晓蕙告诉我们‘掩耳盗铃’的故事。

你怎么说?政府怎么说?新闻部怎么说?大家都有话要说!摆脱,别再把人民当笨蛋傻瓜来耍啦!!

3 comments:

  1. 一个充满教育公民意识性质的节目
    竟然被停播,
    政党领袖如何处理呢?

    尤其一些强调敢怒敢言的。。。

    坦白说,

    若是标榜敢怒敢言,
    就是希望成为人民的喉舌,
    所以类似这样的节目,
    他们应该支持。。。

    一个节目被停播,
    这是正常的,
    但至于是否“应该”被停播。。。
    我真的不明白。。。

    我只是开始感觉,
    这好像白色恐怖的无形压力。。。

    所以我在期待《他们在怎么说》

    ReplyDelete
  2. TV2时事畅谈节目,你怎么说?巫统施压下被斩了.. 马华你怎么说?
    问题太尖锐回答太直接。所以被停播 ??
    马来西亚的新闻自由排名已跌至132名。明年再跌也不出奇
    猷荃 晓蕙,加油吧
    林猷荃 ==> 《你怎么说》 难逃劫数
    http://youquan.blogspot.com/2008/11/blog-post.html

    李晓蕙 ==> 你听过“掩耳盗铃”的故事吗?
    http://li-xiaohui.blogspot.com/2008/11/blog-post.html

    ReplyDelete
  3. 一个痛心的方式,
    我们再一次看到了言论自由的红灯。。。

    这就是白色恐怖的开始??

    我不清楚,也不想去清除。。。

    但我只是感觉很心疼。。。

    人民需要有更好的空间去发言,
    难道你怎么说缺乏了??

    ReplyDelete